Return to Blogs Main Page

Student Engagement in MAP Assessments and Student Goal-setting: Creating a Success Connection

By newtdaddy on September 5, 2012 at 11:49 am

Login to recommend this post »

Please login to like this post. 3

By Eric Newton

“Success connections” are often the stuff from which great school years are created when teachers and their students intentionally link together activities which reinforce each other and increase the opportunity that students will experience success in their learning efforts.  Two activities that demonstrate the creation of a success connection during the first few weeks of the school year are both related to a student’s participation in MAP assessments:  student engagement in the assessment process and student goal-setting related to growth in RIT scores between Fall and Spring assessments.

The “Elephant in the Room” - Student Engagement

The topic of the degree of student engagement in MAP assessments is often the “elephant in the room” in many of the schools using MAP.  While most of us know the importance of high levels of student engagement when the MAP questions appear on computer screens across the United States and around the globe, many of us have just crossed our fingers and hoped for the best, relying on our teacher-led discussions of the importance of MAP assessments to influence our students to take these assessments seriously and try their hardest for the full length of the assessment experience.  However, research conducted by Dr. Steve Wise at NWEA and among our longer term users finds that this is not a topic to be left to chance.  Without strong internal motivators as work, student’s levels of engagement in MAP assessments may vary widely across a group of students and a school, within a season of testing and across the school year.  Lower levels of student engagement typically produce lower scores and bonafide questions about the validity of a student’s score.  One way to tap into a student’s internal motivation is to fully engage in a goal-setting process with students.

Growth Goals as a Motivator

The Fall testing season is an ideal time to discuss the benefit to students and teachers flowing from valid MAP scores and profiles of areas of strength and concern.  Inviting students to fully share their knowledge and skills in order that subsequent instruction can reflect each student’s needs demonstrates the potential positive impact to students and their teachers.  Once determined, the Fall RIT scores then serve as a benchmark from which to establish growth goals for the school year, often set for Spring testing with Winter testing planned as a checkpoint for progress being made toward those Spring growth targets.  Establishment of growth goals provides teachers with a ready-made, goal-driven motivator for subsequent assessments, particularly if teachers invite students to “show me how much you have learned” when the student begins a Winter or Spring assessment.

Success for Teachers and Students

Creating a link between scores on MAP assessments and success in school provides most students the feedback they crave that indicates they are making progress in their learning.  This success connection will help create more valid MAP scores and more accurate descriptions of what students know and are ready to learn…a success connection for both teachers and their students.

 

Eric Newton is a Professional Development Consultant at NWEA

5 comment(s) - you must be logged in to comment

Michael LoCascio's picture
I’ve been using MAP for over ten years now, and through various school districts I have seen the good, the bad, and the ugly when it comes to student goal setting. I agree that getting our students to become invested in the culture of MAP will lead to more valid and reliable information, however, simply using a goal setting worksheet will not create this buy in. The reality is that our students need more than just another worksheet to complete. All too often I’ve seen these sheets displayed on bulletin boards in classrooms and hallways, proudly displaying generic statements like “ I will grow 8 RIT by spring” and sometimes offering child friendly action plans which have no real substance at all such as “I will work harder in class” or “I will do my homework on a regular basis.” After this process is completed, many children have no idea what it would actually substantively take to grow by 8 RIT—these goals are little more than a reflection of a simple understanding that their growth target is a higher number and that the teacher will be happy if they get there. Goal setting of this kind does little to motive the majority of students in the long run, and worse, is effective with just enough students to create a false justification that it’s useful. Don’t get me wrong, I am in favor of goal setting, I just feel that in practice it is often of little substance or value. The better processes which I have observed bear more resemblance to student conferencing then student goal setting. They are based on MAP scores but also discuss classroom performance, state assessment results from the previous year, and other assessments such as AIMsweb, Fountas and Pinnell, etc. They take the time to explain the meaning behind the scores of each of these, and create a shared plan of responsibility both on the teacher and the student in getting the child to meet an appropriate goal, which is based on a RIT range rather than a single number. These conferences are then held again in the middle and end of the year to ensure follow through and discuss progress. But this approach is not for everyone. It is difficult and time consuming, and requires teachers to truly understand their craft and their curriculum—especially how to translate assessment scores into classroom tasks in child friendly terms. But the end result is well informed, motivated students who are invested in their own learning.

Amanda Luce's picture
I will check it out! Thanks so much...

Eric Newton's picture
Hello Amanda. Kids will take seriously those tasks which have meaning for them personally, so many teachers make sure their students know how important the information is that MAP assessments generate, and how the teacher will be using the information. We want students to feel like they are a full partner in this assessment process and without them, it is all pretty much a waste of time. Making sure students give feedback on how they felt about the assessment and how they performed makes the results more personable, and the teacher helps them with that process. Interpretation of the scores and then moving into a goal setting for growth targets for improvement also pulls students into the use of the data and the challenge of doing better next time around. For rich resources on this topic, check out the work and documents available on the website of the Poway Unified School District in CA. They do a great job with MAP results and pulling kids into the process. Eric Newton, Portland.

Amanda Luce's picture
I forgot to mention that this is 3rd-5th graders taking the MAP.

Amanda Luce's picture
We're getting ready to assess starting next week. I am a new Math Coach at my school wanting to help the teachers get the most out of using MAP. What kinds of things can teachers do in preparing their students for this initial Fall testing session, regarding engagement, so that the kids take it seriously and we get a real picture of what they're capable of?

Join the Community

Create Account

Already a member? Sign in

Login to Your Account

Ask a Question

Draw on the knowledge, experience and innovation of your peers across the country and around the world.

Ask a question now!